So, I may
have to change my name after writing this blog. Possibly move out of town.
Today I need to talk about the town meeting. Or as I like to call it, Town
Scrum. I am no rugby fan but this is how I understand a scrum (after looking it
up on my friend google):
Scrum: (noun) an
ordered formation of players... in which the forwards of a team form up with
arms interlocked and heads down, and push forward against a similar group from
the opposing side. The ball is thrown into the scrum and the players try to
gain possession of it by kicking it backward toward their own side.
I will tell you why I consider town meetings a rugby match in
just a moment. First I need to set the stage…ummm, field. Town meetings. I have
never attended a town meeting in my life. Not even sure we had them in San
Francisco, Burlingame, Evanston, Miami Shores or São Paulo which are the places
I have lived in my "adult" life. Okay, possibly in New Canaan (where
I grew up) which is really Weston in a different state, more pink and green,
ACK stickers and twice our size. But I was 18 and didn't care about that
stuff.
Town meeting is the legislative body of our town. Yep, it's up
there front and center on this, our "Brief Guide to Weston Town Meeting
Procedure". The brief guide is two pages long and has everything from how
to participate in a debate (line up at the microphone) and how the voting is
done (a display of official voting cards). It's like auctions gone wild. We got
green voting cards at this last vote. I was going to take it home but it was
collected by the powers that be.
This particular town meeting was a special meeting called
because of some pressing matters such as additional funding of a playground
(now this is the ball that gets thrown into the scrum…wait for it), a new
sidewalk to and from school so kids don't have to walk on the road, and
appropriating spaces for "community housing" (who does not love this
euphemism? I do.).
Let me note that the latter item was "passed over"
but I don't know why. It was not discussed in the meeting (okay the moderator
did say why we wouldn't be talking about it but I didn't hear it). That
discussion will not be a scrum. That will be a mosh pit. No one wants
"community housing" near them. This is a blog post for another day.
So
I got there about 6:50 for the 7 pm start and the high school auditorium was
about a third full. It would become about half full. I did note that there was
a demographic that I don't often see--older folks mostly (I have to watch it
with this term now that I am middle-aged. Older than me. Retired perhaps) then
a group of younger parent-types, some with kids in tow. Remember the 7 pm
start. And kids' bedtimes, if you have kids. Kids who are not vampires.
Stage
set.
First up was approving the budget. Quick discussion, over in about 10
minutes. Passed unanimously. Passed because we were cutting money from
budget due to a decrease in school salaries. I must investigate this one a bit.
I abstained; I know nothing.
Article 2 required a full hour. An hour to decide
whether or not to increase the number of signatures needed to get an item up in
front of town meeting. The petition was to change it from
10 signatures to 100. I am not going
into why this measure was on the ballot here in town. I got the feeling it was
a targeted measure to try to resolve an issue with one resident who keeps on
taking up town time over wanting to take over her neighbor's house for a
parking lot. I may have that wrong. Anyway I voted yes on requiring more
signatures, but the majority said no, we like only 10 signatures because, as
one gentleman commentator said "it can be really hard to get signatures with
such a spread-out town and we're all busy." Yes, we are all busy. Why then
are we taking an hour for all this back and forth? Sigh.
And then the heart of
the heart. The scrum. Here goes. Article 3 was about Additional Funding for
Lamson Playground. This will take waaaaaay too long to summarize here but the
Lamson playground project has been around for a while apparently. We have one
teeny-tiny playground in this town called Tavernside. It is literally at the
side of a tavern (not in service--whoo, that could be a lawsuit!) and small
though shaded and pleasant. My kids (age 9) term it as "lame". We've
been once in the 18 months almost we've lived here. It is also along the Boston
Post Road which splits the playground from the town green. There is some justifiable
concern about getting kids in and out of the place without being smushed like
bugs.
Lamson Park would be our new playground. Right next to the town
hall and on the other side of the town green (not on the Boston Post Road). The
playground was approved in May 2014 before I moved here to Weston. I can only
imagine that town meeting now that I know about this one. Playgrounds cost
money: $225,000 in fact from the town budget, and $40,000 more was raised
privately. I admit that this planning and designing of the playground has gone
on without me paying much attention. My kids will be aged-out before this comes
to pass--and frankly, my kids are open spacers. Free-rangers. Ticks in the
woods. Playgrounds are for recess in their minds.
I was aware of the
battles in the background though. Revolutionary War has nothing on this. Well,
actually it does, as I will tell you shortly (I really had no intention to go
on so long but well, here it is). Plans were changed, trees are being felled,
ziplines being added, a play structure that is visible from space (just
kidding--but it's not necessarily small) and our Weston Town Crier added fuel
to the fire by leading a September front page with "Most Expensive Option
Chosen for Lamson Park". In case you were one of the last souls on earth
to think the media is unbiased, guess again.
So the article at the town meeting
was about asking for $25,000 more to make the park better. Safety was the
number one stated change in mission. And so here we go:
The players:
--Parent
Team, mostly younger parents who wanted kids to have a safe playground
--Historic Team, mostly ummm seasoned individuals who don't want a
playground at all at Lamson Park.
There was probably a third team that was unorganized. A third
team who said yep Lamson, but not the way it was proposed.
But a third team ruins my analogy so let's leave them on the sidelines.
First up, a resident who explained the need for funds. This resident
was a forward for the Parent Team-- he explained how wonderful the park would be
and what a great community-building thing an integrated park and town green
would be, not to mention that we'd have fewer issues with kids crossing the
street and being smushed like bugs. More funding was needed to address some new learnings about the property.
Then the moderator (the Ref?) dropped
the ball into the middle of the scrum. Historic Commission, forward for the
History Team, and Planning Committee, another forward, then linked arms and
stated opposition to the ENTIRE park, not just the updated price tag.
And then
the Historic Team went big time: a Daughter of the American Revolution came up to speak.
I admit
the existence of the DAR organization cracks me up. Seriously, what? So
American. I guess it doesn't exist in many countries, such as Brazil, my foster
country, since that would be a Daughter of the Really-Just-a-Peaceful-Split.
DRJAPS. No. And I guess I personally would be a Daughter-of-the-Dutch-people-fleeing-plague-there-in-the-1860s. Wow that is so not catchy.
Okay here is the explanation of the organization, from its site:
The
organization Daughters of the American Revolution is a lineage-based membership
service organization for women who are directly descended from a person
involved in United States' independence.The DAR, founded in 1890 and
headquartered in Washington, D.C., is a non-profit, non-political volunteer
women's service organization dedicated to promoting patriotism, preserving
American history, and securing America's future through better education for
children.
Okay, keep this "non-political" organization part in
mind. So the DAR comes up at the meeting and says she is opposed to Lamson Park
in general because it is an important historical site. In fact when the new
town hall was built in 1917 ("new" in Boston-type age) everyone was
opposed to that, because it also took Lamson land. She mentioned that
Samuel Lamson was a colonel in the Minutemen and it was from this farm site in 1775 that he
led the Weston Minute Men from the mustering site to the battle in Concord. Okay
he was not a colonel in 1775, but that's quibbling with something that is
frankly, cool. I am so wowed by where I live. The heart of US history (yeah, okay not native American history, I get that).
But I digress. DAR says that Samuel Lamson would NOT have wanted this park--she spoke almost as if she had known him (no, she was not that old). Then she goes on from this nice history lesson to
say and furthermore, this site is probably "somewhat illegal" (her
words) since Lamson stipulated that a structure should never be built there. I
guess the jungle gym is a structure. Sigh. I would like to point out given my
research here that Lamson had seven kids with one wife
and three more with a second and I'm guessing the respective Mrs. Lamsons would
have LOVED a playground there. Maybe not the zipline.
Then a Parent Team forward came up and expressed why playgrounds are so important for the community building. Then a Historic Team came up and
said she suggested we "build Disneyworld Weston at another time."
Yes, I hummed "It's a Small World". I have to change the words. It's
a small town after all…
For the next hour, the scrum moved up and back. One Historic
Team player called the building inspector "full of baloney." One
seemingly neutral player did make a statement on not being opposed to a new
playground, but perhaps thinking of one that was in a less historic
location--he suggested kids needed "lessons in cultural and environmental
stewardship." One lovely woman said she walked around the town green
every day and did not want to be disturbed by the sounds of "screaming
children." I'd like to editorialize that a bit more but right now I am
trying to find out her address so I can send my 9 year old twins to play on her
front lawn. Just the part owned by the town.
Then my favorite comment of the night came from the next speaker
who basically said that if you tried to preserve every supposedly historic site
in eastern Massachusetts, you could not build anything ever. Also he said that
he certainly hoped that the space would not be needed again as a mustering
place, which made me laugh out loud. I got a couple of nasty looks from the
Historic Team players on either side of me. I was afraid I would become the
ball.
Finally a vote was called. Full disclosure: I
abstained. That will not make some of my friends very happy with me but I
really didn't know enough to vote on more money. The cards were raised for and
then against the article. The request for more funding failed. When it was announced at 9:10 pm, applause broke out from the Historic Team. The
Parent Team (and abstainers--me) made a break for the door--I think less
because they were angry but more because it was time to get the users of the
playgrounds, those kids, to bed.
My takeaway from this meeting is that our town has quite a rift
between the parents and the historics. Only time will tell if the parents
can re-group and find a way to make their playground. No, I'm not getting
involved. Except possibly on the task force for making votes in our town a
little less biased to those who can be there at 7 pm on a work night. Let's
make an app.
What could possibly go wrong?
{Note: blog amended February 8, 2016 to reflect correct result. Thank you to my careful readers for the correction}
{Note: blog amended February 8, 2016 to reflect correct result. Thank you to my careful readers for the correction}